bind verbose logging
eyeronic.design at gmail.com
Fri May 10 03:27:33 UTC 2013
I'll send over some info tomorrow. Shoot me a reminder if you don't
get it by the later afternoon.
I wouldn't really call it a schema...it's just a simple field
extraction bash script that then generates the sql inserts. Like I
said...quick and dirty.
Afte coding it from scratch, I'm starting to like the idea of using
Splunk as a front-end to analyze the logs. You may want to look at
using that rather than coding one by hand. The free version can index
500 megs a day...which is a *lot* of queries.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:14 PM, shawn wilson <ag4ve.us at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, that's what I'm looking for.
> Mike, sure I wouldn't mind schema ideas.
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:56 PM, staticsafe <me at staticsafe.ca> wrote:
>> On 5/9/2013 22:52, shawn wilson wrote:
>>> In this log line, what is -EDC? I've also noticed +, -, -E, and -ED
>>> but I have no Idea what they are (called/represent).
>>> 08-May-2013 08:04:49.751 client 220.127.116.11#48747 (ns2.example.com):
>>> query: ns2.example.com IN AAAA -EDC (18.104.22.168)
>>> Also, I'm writing a parser and we're only loging 'queries' but if
>>> someone has examples / schemas for the other categories, I'd like to
>>> integrate that.
>> "+EDC on a query indicates that it is:
>> - Recursive (+) - it has come from a client or a server that is
>> forwarding queries to your server
>> - The sender is using EDNS0 (using larger UDP packet sizes and
>> signalling the size that can be accepted)
>> - The sender understands DNSSEC (D) - this is a request to your server
>> to include any DNSSEC material associated with answer in the query reply.
>> - DNSSEC validation checking is disabled (C) - the sender wants the
>> answer anyway, even if the validation checks fail."
>> Source -
>> Also see https://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation for further
>> O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
>> Please don't top post - http://goo.gl/YrmAb
>> Don't CC me! I'm subscribed to whatever list I just posted on.
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
More information about the NANOG