BCP38 needs advertising

Fri Mar 29 12:54:12 UTC 2013

    Well,

    http://www.BCP38.info is up.   

    Now to make it sexy :(

    Being that my English is barely passable (my French is worst btw)
=D, I won't be able to carry this alone.

    PS:
        Account creation is up and verified...
        I'm gathering reference to other projects and sites (feel free
to send them to me offlist);
        The wiki is/will be fully indexed on major search engines;
        I'm planning to also add reference to documented events to
increase eyeballs on BCP38;
        Nothing is set in stone...  from the wiki (maybe another CMS),
the look, the registrar or even the hosting location.

    Hopefully this can become usefull =D

-----
Alain Hebert                                ahebert at pubnix.net   
PubNIX Inc.        
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443

On 03/27/13 13:17, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> Please reference:
>
> http://openresolverproject.org/
> http://spoofer.csail.mit.edu/
> http://blog.cloudflare.com/deep-inside-a-dns-amplification-ddos-attack
>
> ...and anything else to raise the awareness level.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - ferg (co-perpetrator of BCP38)  :-)
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Alain Hebert <ahebert at pubnix.net> wrote:
>
>>     bcp38.org coming soon =D
>>
>> -----
>> Alain Hebert                                ahebert at pubnix.net
>> PubNIX Inc.
>> 50 boul. St-Charles
>> P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
>> Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443
>>
>> On 03/27/13 11:20, Jack Bates wrote:
>>> Outside of needing more details and examples, BCP38 could use more
>>> advertising.
>>>
>>> The best option, if they would accept it, is to have all RIRs mention
>>> BCP38 as well as require that mention of BCP38 be included in all IP
>>> justification requests to customers (so that those who receive
>>> netblocks from their ISPs are also aware of it).
>>>
>>> For ARIN, at least, having it mentioned in the attestation process
>>> wouldn't be a bad idea. At least someone of management would be aware
>>> of it.
>>>
>>> The only issue is see concerning the RIRs is that they may object to
>>> it being out of scope to their duties. However, informing people of
>>> something is not requiring implementation of something. On the other
>>> hand, we know that there are a great number of networks that don't
>>> participate with the community at large and may have no idea about
>>> BCP38 and why it is important.
>>>
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>