Open Resolver Problems

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Thu Mar 28 00:16:57 UTC 2013


On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:59:16 -0500, Jack Bates said:
> On 3/27/2013 4:49 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> > Jack Bates <jbates at brightok.net> wrote:
> >
> >> 3) BCP38 (in spirit)
> > That should be deployed as well as RRL.
> >
> > Tony.
>
> If BCP38 was properly deployed, what would be the purpose of RRL outside
> of misbehaving clients or direct attacks against that one server?

It would be quite sufficient just for the misbehaving clients aspect.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130327/861038e2/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list