Class E addresses in the wild

George Herbert george.herbert at gmail.com
Thu Mar 21 19:06:28 UTC 2013


It is (or was) fairly commonly in use among internal nets which
overflowed RFC 1918 or have to internetwork with other heavy users of
RFC 1918 space.  I know of at least two service providers and one cell
network who were using it for that 3 years ago.

Someone leaking internal routes for such?  Or attempt to hijack the space?

Only the Shadow knows...


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3 at gmail.com> wrote:
> No authorized IETF use that I know of. See
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  d3e3e3 at gmail.com
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Buz Dale <buzdale at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is anyone else seeing a lot of Class E address space (240.0.0.0/4) at their
>> borders?  Has this space been reinstated in some as yet unknown to me RFC?
>> Thanks,
>> Buz
>>
>> --
>> Buz Dale
>> buzdale at gmail.com
>> GMT -5
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Buz Dale
>> buzdale at gmail.com
>> GMT -5
>> --
>



-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com




More information about the NANOG mailing list