Comcast NOC Contact

Thu Mar 7 19:52:30 UTC 2013

Eugen and NANOG I'm sorry.  My earlier comment was from conversation my last employer had about peering with Comcast where they told us they had balanced ratios.  You can see from Ren Provo that is no longer true.  This is politics as usual, playing the silly game.  I am sorry to offend.  I wish they work things out with Google so Youtube will stop buffering.

Regards
Vinod

> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:16:47 +0200
> Subject: Re: Comcast NOC Contact
> From: eugen at imacandi.net
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> 
> My comment was more or less directed to the person that said "losts of
> people want to send traffic to comcast, but no one wants to send money". I
> find it very dangerous and provocative, and somewhat on the same line with
> others that believe in the "sender party pays" crap they're trying to force
> onto the market.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Jamie Bowden <jamie at photon.com> wrote:
> 
> > > From: Eugeniu Patrascu [mailto:eugen at imacandi.net]
> >
> >
> > > Comcast's customers send money to Comcast in order to receive whatever
> > > they
> > > want from other networks. With that money, Comcast should invest in
> > > infrastructure so that it's network is not saturated anymore. Isn't this
> > > how IPSs work ? :)
> >
> > In competitive markets, that's the theory.  That would require one to test
> > with...
> >
> > Jamie
> >