Google's QUIC

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jun 28 21:00:08 UTC 2013


On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan at gmail.com> wrote:
> "In the presence of layer-3 load-balancers, a multiplexed transport has the
> potential to allow the different data flows, coming and going to a client,
> to be served on a single server." - Google
>
> I'll drink the juice

i don't think much juice is required... doesn't that just say that the
same 'flow' will follow the same path through the network? and that
most/all (save a10/yahoo!) loadbalancers just LB based on 5-tuple (at
best)? so keeping things in a single flow/stream/5-tuple will drop
packets from one host deterministicaly on a single other host at the
far side?




More information about the NANOG mailing list