/25's prefixes announced into global routing table?
Brandon Martin
lists.nanog at monmotha.net
Sat Jun 22 05:19:49 UTC 2013
On 06/22/2013 12:44 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> The forwarding hardware is generally going to be the limit, and
>>> that's going to be painful enough as we approach a half million
>>> prefixes.
>>
>> True. And that's why we must avoid IPv6.
>
> This is not only wrong, it makes no sense whatsoever.
>
So here's a question: has anyone done any musings/reasearch on how big
of a global IPv6 table we could expect given current policies if IPv6
were as widely deployed and used as IPv4 (or if IPv4 didn't exist)?
--
Brandon Martin
More information about the NANOG
mailing list