net neutrality and peering wars continue

Robert M. Enger NANOG at enger.us
Thu Jun 20 22:47:54 UTC 2013


Perhaps last-mile operators should
A) advertise each of their metropolitan regional systems as a separate AS
B) establish an interconnection point in each region where they will accept traffic destined for their in-region customers without charging any fee

This leaves the operational model of WAN backbone transit networks unchanged: fights about traffic balance and settlement fees can continue in perpetuity.

Those big sources who fall afoul of balance can opt to deliver traffic directly to the last-mile network(s) in given markets.
      Transfers WAN networking cost-burden to the content originator (through their agents: CDN operators or transit providers)
      Reduces financial burden on last-mile operator (demand is reduced on their company operated backbone and/or transit capacity that they purchase)

RESULTS
Customers get to receive content they are requesting: technical and political impediments are removed.
Last-mile operator only has to improve in-region network facilities: to deliver the data that their own customers have requested








More information about the NANOG mailing list