chargen is the new DDoS tool?
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Wed Jun 12 02:55:12 UTC 2013
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:37:04 -0400, "Ricky Beam" said:
> Indeed I have. Which is why I haven't for a great many years. Academics
> tend to be, well, academic. That is, rather far out of touch with the
> realities of running / securing a network.
Do you have any actual evidence that a .edu of (say) 2K employees
is statistically *measurably* less secure than a .com of 2K employees?
We keep hearing that meme - and yet, looking at the archives of this list,
I see a lot more stories of network providers who should know better doing
stupid stuff than I see of .edu's doing stupid stuff.
The Verizon report says small business is actually the biggest cesspit of abuse:
http://money.cnn.com/2013/04/22/smallbusiness/small-business-cybercrime/index.html
http://www.verizonenterprise.com/DBIR/2013/
~100 employee firms in health care appear to be a particular lost cause.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130611/4d8599dc/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list