Headscratcher of the week

Sat Jun 1 04:18:51 UTC 2013

I agree with previous poster, table size progression and corresponding
increase in search delay, probably related directly to the monitoring
itself, or at least a connection state of some kind.

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Jake Khuon <khuon at neebu.net> wrote:

> On 31/05/13 17:30, Brett Frankenberger wrote:
>
>          How can you possibly have consistent increase in latency like
>>> that?
>>> I'd love to hear theories (or offers of beer, your choice!).
>>>
>>
> Variation of the buffer filling theory is that there's some
> QoS/traffic-shaping going on which is causing your ping packets to get
> classed and policed into an ever depleting buffer pool.
>
> I wonder what would happen to the pattern if you reset the interface. |8^)
>
>
> --
> /*=================[ Jake Khuon <khuon at NEEBU.Net> ]=================+
>  | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers     /| / [~ [~ |) | | -------- |
>  | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation  / |/  [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS |
>  +=============================**==============================**=======*/
>
>