Hilton proxy issue

Grant Ridder shortdudey123 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 31 23:34:21 UTC 2013


Sounds great Jay, thanks!

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Jay Moran <jay+NANOG at tp.org> wrote:

> I have BCC'd the likely appropriate Hilton contact for you on this
> response so they can take a look at the NANOG emails below regarding their
> Internet proxies to see if it looks like something they can assist with.
> They were able to have some MTA issues corrected last time Hilton came up
> on the NANOG list. Good luck!
> --
> Jay Moran
> http://linked.com/in/jaycmoran
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Better yet, does anyone have any Hilton contacts they could pass my info
>> to?
>>
>> -Grant
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 at gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Anyone from Hilton out there?  We are still having this issue.  It is
>> not
>> > a wayport address since I looked and they are not registered under
>> Hilton's
>> > name.
>> >
>> > -Grant
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 at gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> The requests are coming from 167.187.100.202 which is in a /16 assigned
>> >> to Hilton.  As far as i know, the waypoint service has its own
>> netblocks.
>> >>
>> >> -Grant
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jul 16, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 at gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Hi,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Anyone from Hilton Hotels NOC or related on here?  We are seeing
>> their
>> >>> > internet proxy doing weird things to http requests to servers at
>> >>> $DAYJOB.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Many of the hilton properties have migrated to Wayport/"attwifi".  Are
>> >>> you seeing the requests from AT&T/Wayport or from their corporate?
>> >>>
>> >>> (btw, if you're here and with wayport/attwifi, i would be interested
>> in
>> >>> chatting briefly with you).
>> >>>
>> >>> - Jared
>>
>
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list