On topic of domains
asullivan at dyn.com
Fri Jul 12 11:20:49 UTC 2013
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
> Domain names can be presented with a trailing dot. A fully
> qualified domain always contains at least one explicit dot.
But not always at the end, which is why there's a problem. RFC1123, in my
opinion, contains a remark that ought to indicate to people that the
trailing dot convention isn't even universal for determining whether a name
is really fully-qualified. (See section 220.127.116.11. That RFC is also, of
course, how we got 3com.net as a legal name, for prior to 1123 "3com"
wasn't a valid label anywhere.)
More information about the NANOG