google troubles?

Mike Jackson mike at routed.ca
Wed Jul 10 16:20:34 UTC 2013


I just realized that it's not Google IP space (74.125.0.0/16), Rogers is
hijacking the DNS and resolving www.google.com to space within
64.71.240.0/20 which is Rogers IP space! (note the name server set as
8.8.8.8)

davinci#traceroute www.google.com

Translating "www.google.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]

Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to www.google.com (66.185.85.29)

  1 x.x.x.x [AS 812] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  2 so-4-0-2.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.rogers.com (66.185.82.129) [AS 812] 8
msec 8 msec 4 msec
  3 69.63.252.222 [AS 812] 4 msec 0 msec 8 msec
  4 69.63.250.162 [AS 812] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
  5  *  *  *
  6  *  *  *
  7  *  *  *
  8  *  *  *
  9  *  *  *
 10  *  *  *

TOR2-CORE-R1#show ip bgp 66.185.85.29
BGP routing table entry for 66.185.80.0/20, version 13095115
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default)
  Advertised to update-groups:
     14
  701 6461 812
    205.205.23.121 from 205.205.23.121 (137.39.8.42)
      Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best
TOR2-CORE-R1#


Thanks,

  - Mike


On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Mike Jackson <mike at routed.ca> wrote:

> I can see the Google IP space (64.71.240.0/20) from Verizon/AS701, but
> not from Rogers/AS812 in Toronto.  I've done a few other test traceroutes
> through Rogers to verify that they didn't filter UDP/ICMP.  At this point
> nothing would surprise me from Rogers.
>
> AS701
> =====
>
> TOR2-CORE-R1#traceroute www.google.com
> Translating "www.google.com"...domain server (8.8.8.8) [OK]
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to www.google.com (74.125.26.99)
> VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
>   1 x.x.x.x [AS701] 4 msec 0 msec 0 msec
>   2 0.ge-11-0-0.XT4.TOR2.ALTER.NET (152.63.133.78) [AS 701] 4 msec 0 msec
> 4 msec
>   3 0.so-4-0-3.XT2.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.0.73) [AS 701] 16 msec 16 msec
> 16 msec
>   4 TenGigE0-7-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.125) [AS 701] 20 msec
>     TenGigE0-5-1-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.73) [AS 701] 16 msec
>     TenGigE0-5-4-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.18.206) [AS 701] 20 msec
>   5 72.14.238.232 [AS 15169] 16 msec 16 msec 20 msec
>   6 72.14.236.208 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 680976 Exp 4] 16 msec 16 msec
>     72.14.236.206 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 533197 Exp 4] 20 msec
>   7 209.85.249.11 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 16668 Exp 4] 24 msec
>     72.14.239.93 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 14644 Exp 4] 24 msec
>     209.85.249.11 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 13978 Exp 4] 24 msec
>   8 209.85.243.114 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 568789 Exp 4] 32 msec
>     209.85.241.222 [AS 15169] [MPLS: Label 632535 Exp 4] 32 msec 32 msec
>   9 216.239.48.159 [AS 15169] 36 msec 32 msec
>     216.239.48.59 [AS 15169] 32 msec
>  10 www.google.com (74.125.26.147) [AS 15169] 32 msec 32 msec 32 msec
>
>
>
> AS812 (Rogers Looking Glass https://supernoc.rogerstelecom.net/lg/)
> ===================================================
>
> *Query:* *tr 64.71.249.45*
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Tracing the route to 64.71.249.45
>
>   1 64.71.255.62 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
>   2 ge-4-3-0.gw02.ym.phub.net.cable.ROGERS.com (66.185.82.237) 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>   3 69.63.250.189 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>   4 69.63.250.174 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
>   5  *  *  *
>   6  *  *  *
>   7  *  *  *
>   8  *  *  *
>   9  *  *  *
>  10  *  *  *
>  11  *  *  *
>  12  *  *  *
>  13  *  *  *
>  14  *  *  *
>  15  *  *  *
>  16  *  *  *
>  17  *  *  *
>  18  *  *  *
>  19  *  *  *
>  20  *  *  *
>  21  *  *  *
>  22  *  *  *
>  23  *  *  *
>  24  *  *  *
>  25  *  *  *
>  26  *  *  *
>  27  *  *  *
>  28  *  *  *
>  29  *  *  *
>  30  *  *  *
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>   - MJ
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey123 at gmail.com]
>> Sent: July-10-13 10:57 AM
>> To: John York
>> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: google troubles?
>>
>> Does anyone have traceroutes showing where the issues are?
>>
>> -Grant
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:45 AM, John York
>> <johny at griffintechnology.com>wrote:
>>
>> > We saw the same thing, but seems to be cleared up now. All our
>> > providers that routed to Google addresses in ATL had the issue. We
>> > have one provider that lands on Google addresses in DFW, and it was
>> working.
>> >
>> > ...And now I see that it isn't completely resolved. Some Google apps
>> > are still inaccessible via the Atlanta routes.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Blair Trosper
>> > <blair.trosper at gmail.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google
>> services.
>> > >  Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately.  It's fine
>> > > for
>> > me,
>> > > but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to
>> > > the Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.
>> > >
>> > > It's anecdotal, but it would seem like there's an issue based on
>> > > these reports.
>> > >
>> > > Oh, and this:
>> > > http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/tech/web/google-down/index.html
>> > >
>> > > Anyone know what's up?  Fiber cut?  DC outages?
>> > >
>> > > -- blair
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > John York
>> >
>> > Information Technology | Network Administrator
>> >
>> > Phone: 615-399-7000 x:333
>> >
>> > Griffin Technology
>> > 2030 Lindell Avenue Nashville, TN  37203 USA
>> >
>> > This message and any attachments should be treated as confidential
>> > information of Griffin Technology, Inc.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list