.nyc - here we go...

Eric Brunner-Williams ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net
Fri Jul 5 01:02:35 UTC 2013

Someone who should know better wrote:

> Well give that .com thingie is IPv6 accessable and has DNSSEC there
> is nothing we need to let you know.  And yes you can get IPv6
> everywhere if you want it.  Native IPv6 is a little bit harder but
> definitely not impossible nor more expensive.

And this was true when the v6 and DEC requirements entered the DAG?

Try again, and while you're inventing a better past, explain how
everyone knew that it would take 6 revisions of the DAG and take until
3Q2012 before an applicant could predict when capabilities could be

The one thing you've got going for you is that in 2009 no one knew
that almost all of the nearly 2,000 applicants would be forced by
higher technical and financial requirements to pick one of a universe
of fewer than 50 service providers, or that nearly all of the
"developing economies" would be excluded, or self-exclude, from
attempting to apply. So the basic diversity assumption was wrong.

Why are the people who don't follow the shitty process so full of
confidence they have all the clue necessary?


More information about the NANOG mailing list