.nyc - here we go...

Thu Jul 4 23:55:01 UTC 2013

In message <9FF40D24-169E-4568-9F25-EE00BEEED13A at matthew.at>, Matthew Kaufman writes:
> Well, for starters there's whole truckloads of surplus gear that you
> can't  get for pennies and use successfully.

Surplus IPv6 capable gear has been around for a long while now.
Remember most gear has had IPv6 for over a decade now.  A lot of
gear that ISC got given for IPv6 development was on it 2nd or 3rd
repurposing before we got it nearly a decade ago.

> Matthew Kaufman
>
> (Sent from my iPhone)
>
> On Jul 4, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:34:41 -0700, Eric Brunner-Williams said:
> >
> >> #insert usual junk from *nog v6 evangelicals that .africa and .eos
> >> (Basque Autonomous Region) must drive v6 adoption from their
> >> ever-so-deep-pockets, or the net will die.
> >
> > I'll bite.  What's the *actual* additional cost for dnssec and ipv6
> > support for a greenfield rollout?  It's greenfield, so there's no
> > "our older gear/software/admins need upgrading" issues.
>

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org