NANOG Digest, Vol 60, Issue 113
John_Brzozowski at Cable.Comcast.com
Thu Jan 31 21:18:25 UTC 2013
This is news, it would be great if more details were available. Anyone?
John Jason Brzozowski
e) mailto:john_brzozowski at cable.comcast.com
From: "nanog-request at nanog.org" <nanog-request at nanog.org>
Reply-To: NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:20 PM
To: NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: NANOG Digest, Vol 60, Issue 113
>Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:16:40 -0500 (EST)
>From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner at cluebyfour.org>
>To: Cutler James R <james.cutler at consultant.com>
>Cc: nanog at nanog.org
>Subject: Re: "Programmers can't get IPv6 thus that is why they do not
> have IPv6 in their applications"....
>Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1301302210440.4289 at whammy.cluebyfour.org>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, David Barak wrote:
>>Comcast removed the "no IPv6" excuse? That removal somehow skipped my
>>house in Washington DC where they installed (last October) a router
>>which does not even support it (an Arrus voice gateway- the one where
>>you can't turn of the crummy 2.4g wireless radio) and none of the
>>folks I've spoken to on the phone can tell me when or if it will be
>I know Verizon is rolling out v6 in some areas of their FiOS footprint.
>The router they provided supports it, but what I got from their customer
>service people was that they ran into some sort of issue with their TV
>set-top boxes working properly with IPv6 or at least in a dual-stack
>environment. At least that's where things stand in Pittsburgh.
>I don't think they've provided training to their customer service people
>on IPv6 yet. The rep I spoke with a few weeks ago told me I was the first
>customer that has asked her about it.
>Looking forward to native v6 / dual-stack here...
More information about the NANOG