Ethernet Service at 150 S. Market Street, SJ

PC paul4004 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 29 20:58:12 UTC 2013


For typical console access/OOB use cases only or a lot more data?  If the
former, I can't see any reason to mess with anything more than a
telemetry-rate plan SIM card in a 3g/4g console server.  Chances are, if
you can get cell phone coverage to your cage, it will work fine.  They're
also very cheap, lower latency, and nothing more than velcro is needed to
install them.



On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Warren Bailey <
wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:

> I would be more than happy to put an antenna on a data center roof.
> Depending on throughput requirements, it would probably end up being
> cheaper to use satellite. Satellite is excellent for actual OOB and
> obviously much more reliable in a DR scenario.
>
>
> From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: George Herbert <george.herbert at gmail.com>
> Date: 01/29/2013 12:33 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon at gmail.com>
> Cc: Warren Bailey <wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com>,nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Ethernet Service at 150 S. Market Street, SJ
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Last I heard, roof rights are pricey down there :)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Warren Bailey <
> > wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
> >
> >>  Satellite! ;)
>
> ...And somewhat silly, given that it's *that* facility.  But the roof
> is mostly clear, if anyone needs to put up a dish.
>
> There are a couple of metro wireless providers that can touch that
> location as well, in case your definition of OOB is pretty robustly
> out-of-band...
>
> But the likely solution is a network provider already there or nearby.
>
>
> --
> -george william herbert
> george.herbert at gmail.com
>
>


More information about the NANOG mailing list