Muni network ownership and the Fourth
dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Tue Jan 29 16:23:48 UTC 2013
On 1/29/2013 7:59 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Rob McEwen" <rob at invaluement.com>
>> (C) The fact that the Internet is a series of PRIVATE networks... NOT
>> owned/operated by the Feds... is a large reason why the 4th amendment
>> provides such protections... it becomes somewhat of a "firewall" of
>> protection against Federal gov't trampling of civil liberties... but
>> if they own the network, then that opens up many doors for them.
> Regular readers know that I'm really big on municipally owned fiber networks
> (at layer 1 or 2)... but I'm also a big constitutionalist (on the first,
> second, fourth, and fifth, particularly), and this is the first really good
> counter-argument I've seen, and it honestly hadn't occurred to me.
> Rob, anyone, does anyone know if any 4th amendment case law exists on muni-
> owned networks?
The challenge, here, is a classic 'natural monopoly' concern/argument.
I don't know the right answer, here, but I think the frame for
discussing it has a long history.
More information about the NANOG