Fwd: Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Tue Jan 29 12:29:33 UTC 2013
andy at shady.org replied:
Subject: Re: switch 10G standalone TOR, core to DC
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:25:57 +0000
From: andy <andy at shady.org>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org>
CC: Piotr <piotr.1234 at interia.pl>, nanog at nanog.org
Force10's S4810 isnt bad, we use these for a 10G 48 port box that doesnt
require Ultra Low latency.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90301756/Dell-Force10-S4810-Spec-Sheet
Supports TRILL in some way too, Ive not had any major issues with this box,
1 or 2 bugs, but force10 (now dell)
seem quick to fix these.
They also have the Z9000 series, Ive not looked at this, but it might be
worth having a quick look and see if it
fits.
on the rest, what nick said..... :)
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:58:14AM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 29/01/2013 11:27, Piotr wrote:
> > Extreme 670 looks good but they have small port buffers. It can be also
> > some small chassis with line cards but the cost per 10G ports is too big..
>
> the extreme x670, juniper ex4550, brocade ICX6550 and arista 7150 will most
> of this, and probably many others too.
>
> None of them will do trill. The Extreme X670 and Juniper EX4550 will both
> do VPLS, though. The X670 won't do BGP.
>
> You won't find a box of this form with large port buffers. There don't
> appear to be any of these boxes on the market at the moment, probably
> because none of the switch vendors want to bite the bottom out of their
> more lucrative chassis-based switches. This is a good market opening for a
> new vendor - there is no technical reason why this couldn't be done.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
--
andy andy at shady.org
-----------------------------------------------
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down
to their level, then beat you with experience.
JNCIE #742
-----------------------------------------------
More information about the NANOG
mailing list