IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers

Måns Nilsson mansaxel at besserwisser.org
Tue Jan 29 08:37:10 UTC 2013


Subject: Re: IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers Date: Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:45:39PM +0400 Quoting Mukom Akong T. (mukom.tamon at gmail.com):
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu <eugen at imacandi.net>wrote:
> 
> > I thought about running pure IPv6 inside and do 6to4, but it's too
> > much of a headache,

> Does an L2 switch really care about IPv6? (except for stuff like DHCPv6
> snooping, etc?)

For management it does care.  NO ipv4 is NO ipv4. As in not even
management addresses.

-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
Will the third world war keep "Bosom Buddies" off the air?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130129/6ede019e/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list