Issues with level3?

Warren Bailey wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com
Tue Jan 15 18:11:08 UTC 2013


Randy beat me.. :/

Class C
192.  0.  0.  0 = 11000000.00000000.00000000.00000000
223.255.255.255 = 11011111.11111111.11111111.11111111
                  110nnnnn.nnnnnnnn.nnnnnnnn.HHHHHHHH


On 1/15/13 10:04 AM, "Randy Carpenter" <rcarpen at network1.net> wrote:

>
>----- Original Message -----
>> On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +0000, Warren Bailey wrote:
>> >> I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
>> > More efficient that way - "class c" uses fewer syllables than
>> > "slash
>> > twenty four" :-)
>> >
>> You realize that class-c address space was only found within 192/8
>> e.g.
>> if you print it in hex, C0000000. so not only is it historically
>> irrelevant but you're using it wrong anyway.
>
>But, class B is not B0000000 and A is not A0000000, so is that actually
>true, or just a coincidence?
>
>Class C was actually 192.0.0.0-223.255.255.255 (192.0.0.0/3)
>
>-Randy
>
>





More information about the NANOG mailing list