De-funding the ITU

Owen DeLong owen at
Mon Jan 14 08:31:37 UTC 2013

The regulatory side of ITU-T is responsible for much of the damaging legacy Telecom attitude of revenue entitlement.

I think defunding that and seeing what is developed in its place might well be a good thing.


On Jan 12, 2013, at 9:04 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred at> wrote:

> On Jan 12, 2013, at 8:17 PM, John Levine <johnl at> wrote:
>> Please learn a little more about the ITU before doing so.  There is
>> more to the ITU than the dysfunctional ITU-T, and the political
>> fallout from the US being seen as a big rich bully taking its wallet
>> and going home is likely not worth the trivial amount of money
>> involved.
> On that I would agree. ITU-D and ITU-R do a lot of good work. ITU-T does reasonable work, for the most part, in regulatory matters, which neither the IGF nor the IETF address. Frankly, if the ITU gets shut down, ITU-R, ITU-D, and the regulatory component of ITU-T will have to be re-created to accomplish those roles. Where we have travelled in circles with the ITU is in conflicting technical standardization and in the desire of ITU-T staff to take over certain functions from ICANN and the NRO. Shutting down the ITU would be in effect discarding the baby with the bathwater.

More information about the NANOG mailing list