Gmail and SSL
christopher.morrow at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 01:03:32 UTC 2013
On Jan 2, 2013 7:36 PM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> > Me, no, although I have read credible reports that otherwise reputable
> > signers have issued MITM certs to governments for their filtering
That's not the case join is referring to.
> The governments in question are watching for exfiltration and they
No, not really. Some are busy tracking "dissidents" among their populations.
> largely use a less risky approach: they issue their own root key and,
> in most cases, install it in the government employees' browser before
> handing them the machine.
Not just for employees.
> A "reputable" SSL signer would have to get outed just once issuing a
> government a resigning cert and they'd be kicked out of all the
> browsers. They'd be awfully easy to catch.
Oh! You mean like cyber trust and etilisat? Right... That's working just
> Bill Herrin
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the NANOG