Gmail and SSL

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at
Tue Jan 1 22:46:20 UTC 2013

On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf at> wrote:
> Perhaps Googles other "harvesters" and the government agents they sell or
> give user credentials to, don't work against privately (not under the
> goverment thumb) encryption keys without the surveillance state expending
> significantly more resources.
> Perhaps the cheapest way to solve this is to apply thumbscrews and have
> google require the use of co-option freindly keying material by their
> victims errr customers errr users.

you lost me in conspiracy theories, can you rephrase?

More information about the NANOG mailing list