looking for terminology recommendations concerning non-rooted FQDNs
Andrew Sullivan
asullivan at dyn.com
Sat Feb 23 02:06:09 UTC 2013
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:12:41PM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
> The spec for a URL also calls out what constitutes a hostname, and
> I've yet to see a HTTP client that trips over a rooted domain name.
Well, RFC 3986 (URI) explicitly allows the final dot. See the section
on reg-name in section 3.2.2. Sometimes this RFC is used as one of
the example sowers-of-confusion, because despite the fact that the
relevant section is talking about DNS domain names, the name of the
segment of the URI is called "host", and hostnames don't have a
trailing dot.
It's no wonder people who merely have to implement this stuff are
confused, when the stnadards development organization in question
can't figure out how the terminology works!
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
Dyn
asullivan at dyn.com
More information about the NANOG
mailing list