NYT covers China cyberthreat
Scott Weeks
surfer at mauigateway.com
Thu Feb 21 18:17:39 UTC 2013
--- calin.chiorean at secdisk.net wrote:
From: "calin.chiorean" <calin.chiorean at secdisk.net>
:: This all seems to be noobie stuff. There's nothing technically cool
:: to see here
>> You mean the report or the activity?
The activity.
>> You seem "upset" that they are using M$ only(target and
>> source).
I'm not upset. I'm pointing out what Steven Bellovin said
in just a few words: "This strongly suggests that it's not
their A-team..."
This is a technical mailing list where cutting edge stuff
is discussed. The compromise was not using cutting edge
stuff and, so, is a big <yawn> for this list.
The report was mainly for reporters. That's why they had
the omg sound byte bullet points at the top. It's also
why they had to explain several low level things in detail.
<snip>
>> Maybe it was meant to be found.
That is a definite possibility.
scott
More information about the NANOG
mailing list