turning on comcast v6
jamie at photon.com
Fri Dec 20 13:07:27 UTC 2013
> From: Lee Howard [mailto:Lee at asgard.org]
> On 12/20/13 7:36 AM, "Jamie Bowden" <jamie at photon.com> wrote:
> >> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com]
> >> I'm almost afraid to ask about the phrase "add-default-route=yes" in the
> >> dhcp-client configuration. That seems wrong on the face of it since you
> >> should be getting your routing information from RA and not DHCP.
> >No, no, no, a thousand times no. I'm sure RA is great for small SOHO
> >networks and for ISPs as a means to hand out resources, but in a
> >corporate environment, we hate you. How many times do the IPv6 people
> >have to hear that until DHCPv6 reaches feature parity with DCHPv4, IPv6
> >is dead to enterprise networks?
> "Parity" isn't enough information; what features are missing? RA is part
> of IPv6, but you don't have to use SLAAC.
> I'd say it's the DHC people who need to hear it, not the IPv6 people, but
I have a question. Why does DHCP hand out router, net mask, broadcast address, etc. in IPv4; why don't we all just use RIP and be done with it?
You don't have to like how enterprise networks are built, but you better acknowledge that they are their own animal that have their own needs and drivers, and telling them that the way their networks are built are wrong and they need to change their whole architecture, separation of service, security model, etc. to fit your idea of perfection isn't winning friends. You are, however, influencing people. Perhaps not in the manner you intended.
More information about the NANOG