do ISPs keep track of end-user IP changes within thier network?

Paul Stewart paul at paulstewart.org
Mon Dec 16 21:09:56 UTC 2013


Back in the day (geesh I feel old just saying that), I deployed a lot of
PM3’s …. Then we moved to Ascend TNT Max stuff - that was very exciting
back then! 

:)

Paul


On 12/16/2013, 3:16 PM, "Vinny_Abello at Dell.com" <Vinny_Abello at Dell.com>
wrote:

>Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
>
>PM3's were pretty solid. PM4's, not so much. They were often problematic
>requiring periodic reboots of the entire chassis to keep them sane even
>right up through the last firmware release until Lucent killed them off
>in favor of their newly acquired Ascend equipment. The team that designed
>them were good guys. We used to work directly with them on issues and get
>early access to beta releases of new firmware for the PM's, including new
>cutting edge protocols such as K56Flex and later V.90. :)
>
>-Vinny
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carlos Kamtha [mailto:kamtha at ak-labs.net]
>Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 3:05 AM
>To: sam at circlenet.us
>Cc: nanog at nanog.org
>Subject: Re: do ISPs keep track of end-user IP changes within thier
>network?
>
>
>The PMs were fantastic.
>
>PM3's were pretty good as well. 2 PRIs or T1s.. 48 56k digital modems, +
>ISDN support.. :)
>
>Carlos. 
>
>On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:21:18PM -0500, Sam Moats wrote:
>> I still have a soft spot for the Portmasters :-). We had rows of PM2's
>> with US robotics 33.6K sportster modems attached on 8mm tape racks.
>> Back when a town of 40K people could all connect through 2XT1's and
>> everyone was happy.
>> Sam Moats
>> 
>> On 2013-12-13 16:59, Jon Lewis wrote:
>






More information about the NANOG mailing list