paul at paulstewart.org
Thu Dec 12 14:04:49 UTC 2013
I thought that was resolved? Don’t have an L2TP scenario at the moment
but will in early January so will have to follow up with engineering to
On 12/12/2013, 8:36 AM, "Nilesh Kahar" <nilesh.kahar at outlook.com> wrote:
>There is a significant delay for user termination via L2TP; more than 40
>--- Original Message ---
>From: "Paul Stewart" <paul at paulstewart.org>
>Sent: December 12, 2013 5:33 AM
>To: "Nilesh Kahar" <nilesh.kahar at outlook.com>, nanog at nanog.org
>Subject: Re: BRAS
>What kind of issues? How many subs and what code?
>On 12/11/2013, 11:14 AM, "Nilesh Kahar" <nilesh.kahar at outlook.com> wrote:
>>Basically I am facing issues with MX80 LNS scenario. So just to make sure
>>with community whether anyone is having similar problem.
>>Also wanted to know about any other good BRAS product which can act fine
>>for LNS - LAC setup.
>>Thanks for all the responses.
More information about the NANOG