turning on comcast v6

Livingood, Jason Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com
Thu Dec 12 00:42:04 UTC 2013


On 12/11/13, 2:32 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:

>
>I'll chime in with a link to data:
>
>http://www.google.com/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption
>
>Looking at things, USA is at 5%+ adoption, which is due to the hard work
>of folks at Comcast (and other ISPs).
>
>Overall google is seeing 2.5%+ of traffic over native IPv6.  in several
>cases IPv6 is actually faster than IPv4:

Anyone else have a good base of comparative performance data with large
data sets / lots of end points?

- Jason

>
>16 bytes from 2001:418:3f4::5, icmp_seq=0 hlim=57 time=18.649 ms
>16 bytes from 2001:418:3f4::5, icmp_seq=1 hlim=57 time=19.008 ms
>16 bytes from 2001:418:3f4::5, icmp_seq=2 hlim=57 time=18.959 ms
>^C
>--- puck.nether.net ping6 statistics ---
>4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss
>round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 18.649/18.872/19.008/0.159 ms
>
>PING puck.nether.net (204.42.254.5): 56 data bytes
>64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=32.920 ms
>64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=18.467 ms
>64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=22.014 ms
>64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=20.807 ms
>64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=19.096 ms
>^C
>--- puck.nether.net ping statistics ---
>5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
>round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 18.467/22.661/32.920/5.280 ms
>
>- jared




More information about the NANOG mailing list