Dan White dwhite at
Wed Dec 11 15:15:31 UTC 2013

On 12/11/13 10:10 -0500, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
>At 09:30 AM 11/12/2013, Dan White wrote:
>>On 12/10/13 19:51 +0530, Nilesh Kahar wrote:
>>>Which is a good BRAS product, to handle 15000 subscribers sessions with
>>>full QoS & other features?
>>Juniper MX (480).
>I heard there were some issues with the LAC/LNS functionality on the 
>MX series vs. JUNOSe on the E series.  Is that still the case?

I have not used those features with the platform, so I can't confirm. The
box has been very solid for us as a subscriber management platform for
q-in-q termination.

Dan White

More information about the NANOG mailing list