gabe at teksavvy.ca
Wed Dec 11 15:12:51 UTC 2013
On 13-12-11 10:10 AM, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
> At 09:30 AM 11/12/2013, Dan White wrote:
>> On 12/10/13 19:51 +0530, Nilesh Kahar wrote:
>>> Which is a good BRAS product, to handle 15000 subscribers sessions with
>>> full QoS & other features?
>> Juniper MX (480).
>> Dan White
> I heard there were some issues with the LAC/LNS functionality on the
> MX series vs. JUNOSe on the E series. Is that still the case?
Well I'm being told by my Juniper sales reps to stay away from LAC/LNS
on the MX for now...so I have. Still rocking E320s
More information about the NANOG