Caps (was Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO)
Michael Thomas
mike at mtcc.com
Sat Dec 7 01:14:57 UTC 2013
On 12/06/2013 05:54 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
>
> I realize most of the NANOG operators are not running end user
> networks anymore. Real consumption data:
>
> Monthly_GB Count Percent
> <100GB 3658 90%
> 100-149 368 10%
> 150-199 173 4.7%
> 200-249 97 2.6%
> 250-299 50 1.4%
> 300-399 27 0.7%
> 400-499 9 0.25%
> 500-599 4 0.1%
> 600-699 4 0.1%
> 700-799 3 0.1%
> >800 1 0.03%
>
> Overall average: 36GB/mo
>
>
> The user at 836MB per month is on a 3.5Mbps plan paying $49.95/mo.
> Do we do anything about it? No - because our current AUP and policies
> say he can do that.
>
Thanks for the stats, real life is always refreshing :)
It seems to me -- all things being equal -- that the real question is
whether Mr. Hog is impacting your
other users. If he's not, then what difference does it make if he
consumes the bits, or if the bits over
the air are not consumed at all? Is it because of transit costs? That
seems unlikely because Mr. Hog's
800gb is dwarfed by your 3658*36gb (almost three orders of magnitude).
If he is impacting other users, doesn't this devolve into a shaping
problem which is there regardless
of whether it's him or 4 people at 200GB?
Mike
More information about the NANOG
mailing list