Ricky Beam jfbeam at
Tue Dec 3 03:34:27 UTC 2013

On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:03:59 -0500, Owen DeLong <owen at> wrote:
>> Not counting MAC users, because they cannot do DHCPv6 without 3rd party  
>> software.
> My Macs seem to do DHCPv6 just fine here without third party software,  
> so I'm not sure what you are talking about.

I've heard many reports of apple not supporting DHCPv6 up to 10.7.  After  
much digging, I have found a single report of it working in 10.8.  So, if  
you're up-to-date, you wouldn't notice it either. :-)

>> Nobody really cared with they limited what RFC1918 space you could use.  
>> (not sure they're still doing that.)
> Not sure what you mean here since RFC-1918 is IPv4 only.

Just providing an example of AT&T Uverse lunacy that hasn't resulted in  
millions of customers leaving.  If you want an IPv6 example, their recent  
2wire firmware update that broke proto-41 tunnels has met with an equally  
fervent "gee-whiz, att" response.

More information about the NANOG mailing list