AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO

Scott Weeks surfer at mauigateway.com
Tue Dec 3 01:41:55 UTC 2013


--- owen at delong.com wrote:
From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com>

I actually tend to doubt it. All of the people I've talked to from the major 
operators have said that the charges in IPv4 were not a revenue source, they 
were an effort to discourage the consumption of the addresses and/or the use 
of static addresses and to try and recover the costs of dealing with them in 
cases where customers were willing to pay.
------------------------------------------


Not jumping into the turd chunkin' contest, but this is not my experience.
The suits definitely want the money for income stream; small as it may be.  
I'd like to hear from others if their experiences are different.

scott



More information about the NANOG mailing list