Verizon DSL moving to CGN

Tue Apr 9 00:51:22 UTC 2013

I think what that screenshot is saying is that after you deploy MAP, 
then if you stop using it the IPv6 addresses don't need to change. I 
would assume you're not saying that you can take your IPv6 addresses as 
you find them and interpret them as MAP End-user prefixes.

Tom

On 08/04/2013 5:38 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Good question.
>
> The End-user IPv6 prefix can be constructed using whatever techniques
> independent of MAP etc. in any deployment requiring IPv4 address sharing.
>
> What is interesting is that the MAP enabled CPE could parse certain bits
> of that IPv6 prefix to mean something for MAP. That's it. Attached is a
> screenshot to illustrate this very point.
>
> Cheers,
> Rajiv
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds at gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 3:48 PM
> To: "nanog at nanog.org" <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
>
>> In what sense do you mean that? The end-user IPv6 prefix certainly ties
>> IPv4 and IPv6 together, hence the interest in the Light-Weight IPv4 over
>> IPv6 alternative.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 08/04/2013 3:13 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> UmmmŠ you mean the IPv6 and IPv4 inter-dependency when you say IP
>>> encumbered?
>>>
>>> If so, the answer is Yes. v6 addressing doesn't need to change to
>>> accommodate this IPv4 A+P encoding.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Rajiv
>>>
>> ...
>>
>