Verizon DSL moving to CGN

Chuck Anderson cra at WPI.EDU
Mon Apr 8 19:18:10 UTC 2013


I think he means patent encumbered.

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:13:11PM +0000, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
> Chris,
> 
> UmmmŠ you mean the IPv6 and IPv4 inter-dependency when you say IP
> encumbered?
> 
> If so, the answer is Yes. v6 addressing doesn't need to change to
> accommodate this IPv4 A+P encoding.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Rajiv
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com>
> Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 2:28 PM
> To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva at cisco.com>
> Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>, nanog list <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
> 
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
> ><rajiva at cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> >Yes, MAP (T-Translation or E-Encap mode) is implemented on two regular
> >routers that I know of - ASR9K and ASR1K. Without that, you are right that
> >MAP wouldn't have been as beneficial as claimed.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >glad it's cross platform... is it also IP encumbered so it'll remain just
> >as 'cross platform' ?




More information about the NANOG mailing list