Verizon DSL moving to CGN

Rajiv Asati (rajiva) rajiva at cisco.com
Mon Apr 8 19:13:11 UTC 2013


Chris,

UmmmŠ you mean the IPv6 and IPv4 inter-dependency when you say IP
encumbered?

If so, the answer is Yes. v6 addressing doesn't need to change to
accommodate this IPv4 A+P encoding.


Cheers,
Rajiv

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com>
Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 2:28 PM
To: Rajiv Asati <rajiva at cisco.com>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>, nanog list <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN

>
>On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
><rajiva at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>Yes, MAP (T-Translation or E-Encap mode) is implemented on two regular
>routers that I know of - ASR9K and ASR1K. Without that, you are right that
>MAP wouldn't have been as beneficial as claimed.
>
>
>
>
>
>glad it's cross platform... is it also IP encumbered so it'll remain just
>as 'cross platform' ?
>





More information about the NANOG mailing list