Verizon DSL moving to CGN

Sun Apr 7 15:26:38 UTC 2013

On Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:54:04 +0300, Alex said:
> Well if the RFCs would just be set in stone already like Moses's 10 commandments
> and if the programmers would actually start writing code for v6
> and if the web site hosting servers would at least have dual stack
> enabled on them
> it would be great.
>
> But till then we just change a RFC here, band-aid IPv4 there and wait
> till everything reaches critical mass and comes crashing on our heads.

I find it interesting that you complain about a 15 year old protocol
not being set in stone, and cite that as a reason for no code getting
done.

But the solution is to take advantage of the fact that the 30 year old
predecessor isn't set in stone either...

(And there's no reason that programmers can't be writing code - RFC3542
came out in May 2003)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130407/635c4598/attachment.sig>