/. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Thu Sep 27 13:04:03 UTC 2012

In a message written on Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:58:09AM -0400, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
> I recall 40Gbit/s Ethernet being promoted heavily for similar reasons
> as the ones in this article, but then 100Gbit/s being the technology
> that actually ended up in most places. Could this be the same thing
> happening?

Everything I've read sounds like a repeat of the same broken decision
making that happened last time.

That is unsurprising though, the same people are involved.

       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120927/ab06728a/attachment.sig>

More information about the NANOG mailing list