joelja at bogus.com
Tue Sep 18 05:25:16 UTC 2012
On 9/17/12 8:16 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> True, but at a price that means this won't occur on very many of earth's many CM and even if it did, when you subtract the space required for cooling them and the space required to produce the power to drive them (and the cooling plants) and the space required to produce the fuels for the power plants and... you still come up short. Indeed, as you make the hosts more dense, you may come up even shorter due to the overhead of supporting them.
> On Sep 17, 2012, at 14:04 , Blake Pfankuch <blake at pfankuch.me> wrote:
>> VMware vSphere on quad processor 1u servers with 768gb of RAM :) that should yield 80-140 VM's per host :) that gets you close on density.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eugen Leitl [mailto:eugen at leitl.org]
>> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 1:55 PM
>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: IPv6 Ignorance
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:27:04AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> What technology are you planning to deploy that will consume more than 2 addresses per square cm?
>> Easy. Think volume (as in: orbit), and think um^3 for a functional computers ;)
More information about the NANOG