mitch at illuminati.org
Mon Sep 17 12:28:09 UTC 2012
I think people forget how humongous the v6 space is...
Remember that the address space is 2^128 (or
340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 addresses) to put
the in perspective (and a great sample that explained to me how large it
was, you will still get 667 quadrillion address per square millimetre of
the Earth’s Surface.
There's a great article on the myths and debunks of the address space at
one of the things it talks about is the /64 and /48 allocation.
> Given that the first 3 bits of a public IPv6 address are always 001,
giving /48 allocations to customers means that service providers will
only have 2^(48-3) or 2^45 allocations of /48 to hand out > to a
population of approximately 6 billion people. 2^33 is over 8 billion, so
assuming a population of 2^33, there will be enough IPv6 /48 allocations
to cater for 2^(45-33) or 2^12 or 4096 IPv6 > address allocations per
user in the world."
- Mitch -
On 17/09/12 04:23, Randy Bush wrote:
> [ yes, there are a lot of idiots out there. this is not new. but ]
>> "We are totally convinced that the factors that made IPv4 run out of
>> addresses will remanifest themselves once again and likely sooner than
>> a lot of us might expect given the "Reccomendations" for "Best
>> Practice" deployment."
> while i am not "totally convinced," i am certainly concerned. we are
> doing many of the same things all over again. remember when rip forced
> a homogenous, often classful, mask length in a network and we chewed
> through /24s? think /64 in ipv6, except it's half the bits not 1/4 of
> them. remember when we gave out As and Bs willy nilly? look at the
> giant swaths of v6 we give out today in the hopes that someone will
> deploy it.
> and don't bs me with how humongous the v6 address space is. we once
> though 32 bits was humongous.
More information about the NANOG