Softlayer/Network layer partial outage in Asian region?

Aftab Siddiqui aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com
Thu Sep 13 08:55:17 UTC 2012


No issues in other parts of the south east. But interestingly I just
circled around the globe to reach the destination you mentioned as per the
ptr.

traceroute to 216.12.194.67 (216.12.194.67), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  124.29.233.141 (124.29.233.141)  0.303 ms  0.413 ms  0.442 ms
 2  ge-1-3-0-edge01-khi.cyber.net.pk (202.163.97.234)  0.426 ms  0.455 ms
0.535 ms
 3  fe-0-1-0-edge2.khi.pk (61.5.158.252)  0.328 ms  0.413 ms  0.741 ms
 4  khi77.pie.net.pk (221.120.205.77)  0.334 ms  0.363 ms  0.748 ms
 5  rwp44.pie.net.pk (221.120.251.145)  12.567 ms  12.499 ms  12.534 ms
 6  Sw275b-khi77c1.pie.net.pk (202.125.128.133)  0.736 ms  0.878 ms  1.420
ms
 7  static-khi-ni01-swa.pie.net.pk (202.125.128.162)  1.725 ms  1.666 ms
1.704 ms
 8  khi77.pie.net.pk (202.125.134.162)  140.570 ms  140.535 ms  140.479 ms
 9  bbr01.eq01.ams01.networklayer.com (195.69.146.82)  137.135 ms  137.284
ms  136.565 ms
10  ae7.bbr02.eq01.ams02.networklayer.com (50.97.18.213)  142.482 ms
142.436 ms  142.362 ms
11  ae0.bbr02.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.210)  136.787 ms
137.905 ms  137.632 ms
12  ae7.bbr01.tg01.lon01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.206)  138.000 ms
137.772 ms  137.729 ms
13  ae1.bbr02.tl01.nyc01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.204)  238.551 ms
244.034 ms  241.251 ms
14  ae1.bbr01.eq01.chi01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.132)  262.464 ms
261.560 ms  262.212 ms
15  ae7.bbr02.eq01.chi01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.171)  259.721 ms
261.217 ms  261.276 ms
16  ae1.bbr02.cs01.den01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.131)  286.070 ms
284.922 ms  284.897 ms
17  ae1.bbr01.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com (173.192.18.148)  312.360 ms
313.124 ms  312.879 ms
18  ae7.bbr02.eq01.sjc02.networklayer.com (173.192.18.165)  311.651 ms
316.019 ms  316.875 ms
19  ae0.bbr01.eq01.tok01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.161)  409.615 ms
413.119 ms  413.175 ms
20  ae1.bbr01.eq01.sng02.networklayer.com (50.97.18.165)  273.512 ms
272.463 ms  273.586 ms
21  ae5.dar02.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.199)  274.449 ms
274.857 ms ae5.dar01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.197)  274.261 ms
22  po1.fcr01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (174.133.118.131)  271.876 ms
po2.fcr01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (174.133.118.133)  272.995 ms *
23  216.12.194.67-static.reverse.softlayer.com (216.12.194.67)  275.354 ms
314.130 ms  314.024 ms

[kindly excuse for the noise]

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui


On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Anurag Bhatia <me at anuragbhatia.com> wrote:

> Seems like Softlayer/Network layer having rouitng glitches in Asia.
>
>
> Their prefix 216.12.192.0/19 is not working in South East. Route goes till
> Singapore router and times out there.
>
>
> traceroute to hostgator.com (216.12.194.67), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
>  1  router.local (192.168.1.1)  1.576 ms  2.025 ms  2.508 ms
>  2  117.212.40.1 (117.212.40.1)  26.500 ms  29.397 ms  31.717 ms
>  3  218.248.173.46 (218.248.173.46)  35.014 ms  36.184 ms  38.806 ms
>  4  115.249.245.198 (115.249.245.198)  50.224 ms  54.037 ms  56.476 ms
>  5  115.255.252.149 (115.255.252.149)  100.129 ms  101.235 ms  106.338 ms
>  6  62.216.147.249 (62.216.147.249)  115.066 ms  116.228 ms  118.407 ms
>  7  ge-1-0-0.0.cjr02.chn001.flagtel.com (62.216.135.226)  121.183 ms
>  83.215 ms so-7-0-0.0.ejr03.sin001.flagtel.com (62.216.128.73)  116.212 ms
>  8  so-7-1-0.0.ejr04.sin001.flagtel.com (62.216.128.153)  116.677 ms
>  118.551 ms 62.216.128.246 (62.216.128.246)  121.665 ms
>  9  p6453.sgw.equinix.com (202.79.197.19)  162.612 ms  163.006 ms  163.631
> ms
> 10  ae12.bbr01.eq01.sng02.networklayer.com (120.29.215.102)  167.409 ms
>  169.761 ms  173.955 ms
> 11  ae6.dar02.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.203)  177.675 ms
>  180.009 ms ae5.dar02.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.199)  171.207
> ms
> 12  po2.fcr01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (174.133.118.133)  180.555 ms *
> *
> 13  * * *
> 14  * * *
>
>
>
> I wonder what causes such issues? Clearly issue is within Softlayer's
> AS 36351. So is it like broken OSPF inside or iBGP?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>


More information about the NANOG mailing list