The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Mon Sep 10 20:51:53 UTC 2012
Nick Hilliard wrote:
>>> Just because something is documented in RFC does not automatically make it a
>>> standard, nor does it necessarily make anyone care.
>> That's not a valid argument against text in the RFC proof read by
>> the RFC editor as the evidence of established terminology of the
>> Internet community.
> you may want to read rfc 1796, and then retract what you said because it
> sounds silly.
Anything written in RFC1796 should be ignored, because RFC1796, an
informational, not standard track, RFC, states so.
Or, is it time to retract your silliness?
More information about the NANOG