RPKI Pilot Participant Notice

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Thu Sep 6 08:38:49 CDT 2012


On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:37 AM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> If a relying party's use of PKI infrastructure legally equated to
> acceptance of the relying party agreement (RPA), then having an
> explicit record of acceptance of the RPA would not be necessary.
>
> Alas, it does not appear possible to equate use of PKI certificates
> with agreement to the associated RPA (and some might argue that this
> is a feature, as some folks would not want to be legally bound to an
> agreement which they did not explicitly review and accept.)

John, Randy:

I'm confused. Are you saying that unlike a whois lookup, I'll need a
contract with ARIN to look up and validate someone else's RPKI
certificate?

Would you clarify which parts of RPKI I need a contract with ARIN to
do and which parts I do not?

Thanks,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



More information about the NANOG mailing list