The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
dtaylor at vocalabs.com
Wed Sep 5 19:50:34 UTC 2012
On 09/05/2012 10:19 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 05:56 AM, Daniel Taylor wrote:
>> On 09/04/2012 03:52 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2012 09:34 AM, Daniel Taylor wrote:
>>>> If you are sending direct SMTP on behalf of your domain from
>>>> essentially random locations, how are we supposed to pick you out
>>>> from spammers that do the same?
>>> Use DKIM.
>> You say that like it's a lower bar than setting up a fixed SMTP
>> server and using that.
> I say it like it addresses your concern.
Well, if you've got proper forward and reverse DNS, and your portable
SMTP server identifies itself properly, and you are using networks that
don't filter outbound port 25, AND you have DKIM configured correctly
and aren't using it for a situation for which it is inappropriate, then
you'll get the same results with a portable SMTP server that you would
sending through a properly configured static server.
So, no, "use DKIM" does not address the delivery difficulties inherent
to using a portable SMTP server.
Daniel Taylor VP Operations Vocal Laboratories, Inc
dtaylor at vocalabs.com 952-941-6580x203
More information about the NANOG