The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
jra at baylink.com
Tue Sep 4 16:05:07 UTC 2012
----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Peach" <john-nanog at johnpeach.com>
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:57:38 -0400 (EDT)
> Jay Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
> > SMTP Auth to *arbitrary remote domains' MX servers*? Am I missing
> > something,
> > or are you?
> I run an MTA on my server and auth to that from laptops and other
> clients. Relaying allowed for authorised users.
So, in other words, it's ok to rant and stomp our feet about the end-to-end
architecture and how critical it is to support in order to diss NAT, but
we're required to ignore it when discussing SMTP?
I'm not sure I'm following, there.
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
More information about the NANOG