Google PTR?

Anurag Bhatia me at anuragbhatia.com
Sat Oct 27 11:05:41 UTC 2012


Hi Blair


I guess that's pretty much because they don't really wish to put any info
related to routers in public including location & circuit bandwidth which
is often given major networks in PTR.


Btw I guess you must be troubleshooting some routing issue. My experience
has been decent with them in past. They are usually responsive on the email
addresses mentioned in peering db for AS15169.

http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=15169





On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Christopher Morrow <
morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:52 PM, nanog <nanog at afxr.net> wrote:
> > On 10/26/2012 7:13 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm sure I'm bringing up a topic that's been brought up before, but I
> >> figured I'd have a go.
> >>
> >> Anyone from Google around that could answer to why there is no reverse
> >> DNS/PTR with most Google IP addresses (from traceroute, etc)?
> >>
> >> Alternatively, is there a server that can be utilized by the net
> operators
> >> community to at least get an answer on some of the IPs?
> >>
> >> It's very frustrating to contend with no PTR records in traces for
> >> troubleshooting and the like.
> >>
> >> Any information (off list or on) would be greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Blair Trosper
> >> Updraft Networks & North Texas GigaPOP
> >
> > Which particular address are you referring to?
> > I get PTR responses for the limited set of address I get from google.
>
> examples are good... I suspect he means things inside 15169's network
> that are not serving external people services: 209.85.243.114
>
> for instance?
>
>


-- 

Anurag Bhatia
anuragbhatia.com

Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> |
Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>|
Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>


More information about the NANOG mailing list