arturo.servin at gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 17:56:23 UTC 2012
Are you suggesting to not use it as intended by RFC6598?
be used as Shared Address Space to accommodate the needs of Carrier-
Grade NAT (CGN) devices. It is anticipated that Service Providers
will use this Shared Address Space to number the interfaces that
connect CGN devices to Customer Premises Equipment (CPE)"
On 18/10/2012 13:25, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Majdi S. Abbas <msa at latt.net> wrote:
>> RFCs are just paper. As for why they use it.. the common private
>> use reserved blocks (10/8, 172.16/12, 192.168/16) are all in use
>> internally in their customers networks. This is probably the easiest
>> way to avoid addressing conflicts.
> but, but, but!! we have that nifty new '1918' space... 100.64.0.0/10
More information about the NANOG