Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only
matthew at matthew.at
Thu Oct 11 08:29:23 UTC 2012
On 10/11/2012 8:44 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Tore Anderson wrote:
>> That some features are available only on the most advanced access
>> technology is perfectly reasonable and to be expected, IMHO. If not,
>> what's the point of upgrading at all?
> Uh, whut? I expect my ssh sessions to survive a 4G->3G handover, and
> if they happen to go over IPv6, I want them to survive.
If your SSH sessions could survive a change in address assignment (which
often happens in a handover), they could survive a change in address
family assignment as well.
Unfortunately, TCP - upon which ssh is built - uses the routing
identifiers as the host identifiers, and so this doesn't work.
> The important reason to upgrade is to get higher speeds, not to get
> access to new L3 tech.
>> I lose my YouTube streams when I get handed over from 3G to 2G, too,
>> for example. I can live with that. I much prefer it to YouTube not
>> working 3G as well, even though that might very well be considered a
>> more "consistent" user experience.
> I don't agree with you at all. I don't believe I would lose the stream
> when doing that handoff in our network, it might buffer some more
> (because EDGE is slower than HSDPA), but you wouldn't lose the stream.
But the stream would almost certainly be coming to a newly assigned IP
address (and once you're doing that, who cares if the family changes too?)
> Consistent behaviour (apart from speed) on all networks is really
> important for me, and I'd imagine it is for most users as well.
The *only* inconsistency would be when you're accessing the IPv6-only
part of the Internet, of which there's currently none that consumers
More information about the NANOG